[Bug binutils/18667] New: cannot compile bfd: targmatch.h:313: error: `arm' undeclared here on sparc-sun-solaris2.9

2015-07-14 Thread saper at marcincieslak dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18667 Bug ID: 18667 Summary: cannot compile bfd: targmatch.h:313: error: `arm' undeclared here on sparc-sun-solaris2.9 Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (HEAD) Status: NEW

[Bug ld/18668] New: relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

2015-07-14 Thread david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 Bug ID: 18668 Summary: relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted) Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: norm

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

2015-07-14 Thread david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 David Abdurachmanov changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-*-linux-gnu

[Bug binutils/18669] New: libiberty demangle.test failure: strtod() on sparc-sun-solaris2.9 does not accept hexadecimal numbers

2015-07-14 Thread saper at marcincieslak dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18669 Bug ID: 18669 Summary: libiberty demangle.test failure: strtod() on sparc-sun-solaris2.9 does not accept hexadecimal numbers Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (H

[Bug binutils/18669] libiberty demangle.test failure: strtod() on sparc-sun-solaris2.9 does not accept hexadecimal numbers

2015-07-14 Thread saper at marcincieslak dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18669 Marcin Cieślak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brobecker at gnat dot com,

[Bug binutils/18667] cannot compile bfd: targmatch.h:313: error: `arm' undeclared here on sparc-sun-solaris2.9

2015-07-14 Thread saper at marcincieslak dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18667 Marcin Cieślak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com,

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

2015-07-14 Thread david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 David Abdurachmanov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org -- Y

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

2015-07-14 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org -- Yo

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

2015-07-14 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #1 from Jiong Wang --- thanks for reporting this, will double check the status -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list

[Bug binutils/17940] See unexpected diagnostic from msp430-elf-objdump BFD: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section.

2015-07-14 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gas/18631] avx512: wrong memory size for vcvtt?ps2u?qq instructions with data broadcast

2015-07-14 Thread alexander.fomin at intel dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18631 Alexander Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #8418|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

2015-07-14 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang --- > > Looking at AArch64 backend in aarch64_type_of_stub there is a check: > > 2287 if ((r_type == AARCH64_R (CALL26) || r_type == AARCH64_R (JUMP26)) > 2288 && (branch_offset > AARCH64_MAX_FWD_BRANCH

[Bug gas/18631] avx512: wrong memory size for vcvtt?ps2u?qq instructions with data broadcast

2015-07-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18631 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Alexander Fomin from comment #3) > Created attachment 8436 [details] > A patch that should fix the issue (+ testcases update) > > This patch is based on the changes proposed by Ramiro Polla, but ex

[Bug gas/18638] Wrong code generated for VMOVQ and VGATHER... on x86 CPU

2015-07-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18638 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.26 (HEAD) Target Milestone|---

[Bug gas/18631] avx512: wrong memory size for vcvtt?ps2u?qq instructions with data broadcast

2015-07-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18631 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.26 -- You are receiving this mail becaus

[Bug gas/18638] Wrong code generated for VMOVQ and VGATHER... on x86 CPU

2015-07-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18638 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

2015-07-14 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug ld/18668] relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers not inserted)

2015-07-14 Thread david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668 --- Comment #3 from David Abdurachmanov --- OpenLoops are suffering from another issue -- the offset between load instruction and constant pool is above 1MB boundary. Yes, you cannot have huge functions in AArch64. PR63304 on GCC (https://gc

[Bug gas/18671] New: gas, AIX, 64-bit, coff-header, f_flags.F_RELFLG -- shouldn't be cleared

2015-07-14 Thread lzsiga at freemail dot c3.hu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18671 Bug ID: 18671 Summary: gas, AIX, 64-bit, coff-header, f_flags.F_RELFLG -- shouldn't be cleared Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: minor

[Bug binutils/18672] New: readelf does not show the last entries in .dynamic section

2015-07-14 Thread simon at atanasyan dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18672 Bug ID: 18672 Summary: readelf does not show the last entries in .dynamic section Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: NEW Severity: normal Prio

[Bug binutils/17940] See unexpected diagnostic from msp430-elf-objdump BFD: Dwarf Error: mangled line number section.

2015-07-14 Thread oarias at knights dot ucf.edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940 Orlando Arias changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---