https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18667
Bug ID: 18667
Summary: cannot compile bfd: targmatch.h:313: error: `arm'
undeclared here on sparc-sun-solaris2.9
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668
Bug ID: 18668
Summary: relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 (veneers
not inserted)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: norm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668
David Abdurachmanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-*-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18669
Bug ID: 18669
Summary: libiberty demangle.test failure: strtod() on
sparc-sun-solaris2.9 does not accept hexadecimal
numbers
Product: binutils
Version: 2.26 (H
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18669
Marcin Cieślak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brobecker at gnat dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18667
Marcin Cieślak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668
David Abdurachmanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
--
Y
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668
Jiong Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |jiwang at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
Yo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668
--- Comment #1 from Jiong Wang ---
thanks for reporting this, will double check the status
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18631
Alexander Fomin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8418|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668
--- Comment #2 from Jiong Wang ---
>
> Looking at AArch64 backend in aarch64_type_of_stub there is a check:
>
> 2287 if ((r_type == AARCH64_R (CALL26) || r_type == AARCH64_R (JUMP26))
> 2288 && (branch_offset > AARCH64_MAX_FWD_BRANCH
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18631
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alexander Fomin from comment #3)
> Created attachment 8436 [details]
> A patch that should fix the issue (+ testcases update)
>
> This patch is based on the changes proposed by Ramiro Polla, but ex
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18638
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.26 (HEAD)
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18631
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.26
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18638
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668
Jiong Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18668
--- Comment #3 from David Abdurachmanov
---
OpenLoops are suffering from another issue -- the offset between load
instruction and constant pool is above 1MB boundary. Yes, you cannot have huge
functions in AArch64.
PR63304 on GCC (https://gc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18671
Bug ID: 18671
Summary: gas, AIX, 64-bit, coff-header, f_flags.F_RELFLG --
shouldn't be cleared
Product: binutils
Version: 2.25
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18672
Bug ID: 18672
Summary: readelf does not show the last entries in .dynamic
section
Product: binutils
Version: 2.25
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Prio
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940
Orlando Arias changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
21 matches
Mail list logo