[Bug gas/18347] On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination register is silently ignored

2015-05-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18347 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ae8714c2712ef9a179cfa9158a289bd400c0ad97 commit ae8714c2712ef9a179cfa9158a2

[Bug gas/18347] On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination register is silently ignored

2015-05-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18347 --- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton --- Right. I have found a way to restrict the test so that it only triggers when the "name = val" form is used, and without having to modify generic code. I have updated the assembler testcase so that it incl

[Bug gas/18347] On ARM, "LDR =something" with missing destination register is silently ignored

2015-05-08 Thread vidyapraveen at arm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18347 --- Comment #9 from Vidya Praveen --- Thanks Nick. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.

[Bug gold/17819] gold crashes when generating build-id for a large .so

2015-05-08 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17819 --- Comment #4 from Cary Coutant --- > I have encountered this problem, too. > Is a patch coming soon, or should I pursue a workaround? I've been working on fixing this, but it's going to take some time. Workarounds are to use a different --

[Bug gold/17819] gold crashes when generating build-id for a large .so

2015-05-08 Thread jim at meyering dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17819 --- Comment #5 from jim at meyering dot net --- Glad you're on it. Thanks for the info. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bu

[Bug gold/18365] GOLD: AArch64: produces broken dynamic executable

2015-05-08 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18365 Han Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/18348] Workaround ARM Cortex-A53 Errata 835769 & 843419

2015-05-08 Thread shenhan at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18348 --- Comment #1 from Han Shen --- Work in progress. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.

[Bug gas/18390] New: how to tell if the dwarf line generated is for literal pools ( re bug 12974 )

2015-05-08 Thread s-pang at ti dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18390 Bug ID: 18390 Summary: how to tell if the dwarf line generated is for literal pools ( re bug 12974 ) Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Sever