[Bug ld/17666] New: ld -r may create reloc sections with unordered relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17666 Bug ID: 17666 Summary: ld -r may create reloc sections with unordered relocs Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/17531] readelf -a crashes on fuzzed samples

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17531 --- Comment #47 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch

[Bug binutils/17531] readelf -a crashes on fuzzed samples

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17531 --- Comment #48 from Nick Clifton --- Thanks Alexander, Those new archive based problems should be fixed now. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/16457] Weak reference leads to bogus entry in .gnu.version_r section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug ld/16452] ELF executable with weak reference linked with ld causes assertion in ld.so

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16452 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug ld/16452] ELF executable with weak reference linked with ld causes assertion in ld.so

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16452 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug ld/16457] Weak reference leads to bogus entry in .gnu.version_r section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16457 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug binutils/17512] segfault in PE parser / _bfd_pei_swap_aouthdr_in

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 --- Comment #116 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branc

[Bug binutils/17512] segfault in PE parser / _bfd_pei_swap_aouthdr_in

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 --- Comment #117 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Alexander, Thanks for the continued testing. In case it is not obvious, I am not too concerned by the "silly argument to malloc" warnings from valgrind. I night fix them one day, but for now the

[Bug gold/17578] Confusing "requires executable stack" warning from gold

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17578 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project "gdb and binutils". The branch,

[Bug gold/17578] Confusing "requires executable stack" warning from gold

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17578 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---