https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Corinna,
> After some discussion with Jon_Y and Yaakov on IRC, I'm pretty much ok
> with moving the default-manifest handling to GCC.
Excellent! :-)
> I'm just wondering if the default-manifest should
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #8 from Corinna Vinschen ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7)
Hi Nick,
> Hi Corinna,
>
> > After some discussion with Jon_Y and Yaakov on IRC, I'm pretty much ok
> > with moving the default-manifest handling to GCC.
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12696
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gdb and binutils".
The branch,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790
--- Comment #9 from Corinna Vinschen ---
(In reply to Corinna Vinschen from comment #8)
> (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7)
> > > I'm just wondering if the default-manifest shouldn't then be made
> > > into its own package, independen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807
--- Comment #2 from Angelo Graziosi ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> Hi Corinna,
>
>I have started looking into this bug, but I am a bit stumped. :-(
>
>I guess that the problem is connected with the default manifest
