http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525
--- Comment #14 from Rainer Orth
2011-03-08 10:18:43 UTC ---
"ian at airs dot com" writes:
> --- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-08
> 05:33:07 UTC ---
> Created attachment 5280
> --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525
--- Comment #15 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-08 14:10:34
UTC ---
What is the value of IOV_MAX on Solaris? The man page implies that it is
defined in some header file, perhaps or .
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userp
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525
--- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth
2011-03-08 14:14:01 UTC ---
> --- Comment #15 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-08
> 14:10:34 UTC ---
> What is the value of IOV_MAX on Solaris? The man page implies that it is
> defined in some header file, per
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525
--- Comment #17 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-08 14:28:19
UTC ---
Thanks. I would also be interesting in knowing whether gold can pass its tests
with the patch I sent, even before you succeed in getting gcc to build.
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525
--- Comment #18 from Rainer Orth
2011-03-08 14:39:08 UTC ---
> --- Comment #17 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-08
> 14:28:19 UTC ---
> Thanks. I would also be interesting in knowing whether gold can pass its
> tests
> with the patch I sent,
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525
--- Comment #19 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09 01:50:37 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-03-09 01:50:33
Modified files:
gold : ChangeLog fileread.h filerea
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525
--- Comment #20 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-09 01:54:58 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_21-branch
Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-03-09 01:54:55
Modified files:
gold
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525
--- Comment #21 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-09 01:56:59
UTC ---
There's not much point to trying to use gold to build gcc until gold passes at
least most of its tests.
The failure on basic_static_test looks like you don't have libc.a or
lib
