http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10708
--- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-27 15:17:32 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_21-branch
Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-02-27 15:17:29
Modified files:
gold
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10708
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-27 18:12:22
UTC ---
The key question here is what the glibc developers believe the correct
behaviour should be. If glibc is currently acting as intended, then GNU ld
should change (and fuse should
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261
--- Comment #8 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-27 21:31:18
UTC ---
I raised the issue on the libc-alpha mailing list:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2011-02/msg00154.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12513
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|amodra at gmail dot com |unassigned at sources dot
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12513
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12513
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-28 07:46:41 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2011-02-28 07:46:37
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog archive.c
Log m
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12513
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-28 07:47:06 UTC ---
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_21-branch
Changes by:amo...@sourceware.org2011-02-28 07:47:04
Modified files:
bfd
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12513
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|