Re: Need help on reducing linker issue

Hi Alan, this linker version is part of a 3rd party development suite, so for myself it's not easy to only update the linker. Can you remember if there was some kind of reproduction scenario at that time? greetings, Roger 2010/11/22 Alan Modra > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:34:29PM +0100, Roger

[Bug gold/12256] New: internal error in do_layout

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12256 Summary: internal error in do_layout Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: i...@airs.com

[Bug binutils/11065] [DllTool] DLL name from DEF file is ignored when using --output-exp option

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11065 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dave.korn.cygwin at gmail

[Bug ld/12253] .eh_frame_hdr not properly sorted with mixed .eh_frame encodings

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12253 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug ld/12253] .eh_frame_hdr not properly sorted with mixed .eh_frame encodings

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12253 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug ld/12253] .eh_frame_hdr not properly sorted with mixed .eh_frame encodings

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12253 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-23 16:01:49 UTC --- > --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra 2010-11-23 13:34:02 > UTC --- > I took a look at this today. Besides the sorting problem, elf-eh-frame.c gets > DW_EH_PE_datarel wrong. datarel is

[Bug ld/12258] New: --enable-gold --enable-ld=default doesn't work

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12258 Summary: --enable-gold --enable-ld=default doesn't work Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo:

[Bug ld/12258] --enable-gold --enable-ld=default doesn't work

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12258 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-23 17:29:12 UTC --- Also "--enable-gold=default --enable-ld=default" is allowed. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --

[Bug ld/12258] --enable-gold --enable-ld=default doesn't work

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12258 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose 2010-11-23 17:46:02 UTC --- Created attachment 5135 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5135 fix typo sorry, a typo. please could you check in this patch as obvious? -- Configure bugmail

[Bug ld/12259] New: ld.bfd is installed when gold isn't enabled

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12259 Summary: ld.bfd is installed when gold isn't enabled Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: una

[Bug ld/12259] ld.bfd is installed when gold isn't enabled

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12259 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose 2010-11-23 18:16:40 UTC --- yes, this is expected. Please see my comments in the email thread. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mai

[Bug ld/12259] ld.bfd is installed when gold isn't enabled

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12259 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-23 18:55:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > yes, this is expected. Please see my comments in the email thread. Can you give me a pointer? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.

[Bug ld/12259] ld.bfd is installed when gold isn't enabled

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12259 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose 2010-11-23 18:58:30 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01109.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug ld/12259] ld.bfd is installed when gold isn't enabled

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12259 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-23 19:32:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01109.html But it doesn't mention that there will always be ld.bfd/ld.gold, which I think is a good idea. -- Con

[Bug ld/12248] BFD linker plugin failed to resolve reference to archive

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12248 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant at google dot com -- Configur

[Bug ld/12253] .eh_frame_hdr not properly sorted with mixed .eh_frame encodings

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12253 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra 2010-11-23 22:27:53 UTC --- Specs can't be trusted, sadly. Look for dbase in gcc/unwind-dw2-fde-glibc.c to see the initialisation for datarel base, used by x86 and frv. Look for ia64 in gcc/unwind-generic.h to

[Bug ld/12248] BFD linker plugin failed to resolve reference to archive

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12248 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-23 23:39:05 UTC --- Created attachment 5136 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5136 A new testcase -pass-through is a hack, not a real solution. Here is a testcase where __udivdi3 in div

[Bug ld/12248] BFD linker plugin failed to resolve reference to archive

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12248 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-23 23:40:57 UTC --- Created attachment 5137 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5137 A testcase to show linker order LTO plugin should preserve linker order. Otherwise, we will generate

[Bug gold/12262] New: gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12262 Summary: gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gold/12261] New: gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 Summary: gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gold/12262] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12262 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #2 from Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2010-11-24 01:23:18 UTC --- Created attachment 5138 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5138 Patch to solve the problem above -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzil

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2010-11-24 03:28:08 UTC --- Thanks for the patch. I've been troubled by this for a while, because defining a symbol in the base version doesn't reliably cause the glibc dynamic linker to select it when lin

[Bug ld/12259] ld.bfd is installed when gold isn't enabled

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12259 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose 2010-11-24 04:00:15 UTC --- It does: "I did choose to always install the bfd linker as ld.bfd and the gold linker as ld.gold, and pointing the link to one of the above." I think it's bad to have a name in a

Re: Need help on reducing linker issue

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 08:28:11AM +0100, Roger Jeurninck wrote: > this linker version is part of a 3rd party development suite, so for myself > it's not easy to only update the linker. In that case we can't help you much more.. > Can you remember if there was some kind of reproduction scenario a

[Bug ld/12259] ld.bfd is installed when gold isn't enabled

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12259 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ld/12253] .eh_frame_hdr not properly sorted with mixed .eh_frame encodings

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12253 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gold/12261] gold fails to link symbols explicitly defined in base-version

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12261 --- Comment #4 from Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2010-11-24 06:46:57 UTC --- Whether there is or not a bug in the glibc loader, is not something that should matter here, IMHO. We have a documented use case that, ELF side, works exactly as intend