--
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11793
--- You are receiving th
--- Additional Comments From zilla at kayari dot org 2010-07-07 14:57
---
I'll just repeat my claim that outputting anything like "did you forget to make
it pure?" is probably worse than the status quo.
Forgetting to define a virtual function (or not linking to the object that
defines i
--- Additional Comments From phresnel at gmail dot com 2010-07-07 15:24
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> If any suggestion is made to the user, it should be to ensure that all
> non-pure
> virtual functions are defined. Which is what the GCC FAQ already says:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.htm
--- Additional Comments From manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-07 15:50
---
I understand your frustration, but linker and compiler do not share a lot of
information and I think there is no way (right now) to give a good diagnostic
for this case. The linker does not know about vtables,
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2010-07-07 16:04 ---
Subject: Re: Add suggestion to error "undefined reference to
`vtable for XXX'"
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 03:50:32PM -, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> I understand your frustration, but linker and compiler d
