--- Additional Comments From loose at astron dot nl 2010-03-03 11:26
---
Hi Nick,
Segfaults remain, though they occur at different places now. Again, they have to
do with not checking the return value of bfd_zalloc. This still happens in a LOT
of places. Is this a deliberate choice of s
--- Additional Comments From loose at astron dot nl 2010-03-03 16:10
---
Created an attachment (id=4642)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4642&action=view)
Partial patch fixes most (or all?) segfaults
Here's a minimal patch that fixes most segfaults. I.e., I have n
--- Additional Comments From amodra at gmail dot com 2010-03-04 00:15
---
Huh, there's lots of sloppy programming in dwarf2.c I'm testing a patch that
catches all alloc failures in that file.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From rohan dot hart17 at gmail dot com 2010-03-04
00:16 ---
There appears to be no corresponding bug against glibc. Perhaps this one could
be reassigned?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10937
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04
04:02 ---
Subject: Bug 11302
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org 2010-03-04 04:01:53
Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog dwarf2.c
Log message:
