[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols

2008-10-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-09 12:55 --- Created an attachment (id=2985) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2985&action=view) Add libiberty.a to the shared lib adds -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6937 --- Y

[Bug binutils/6937] binutils 2.18 fails linking libopcodes.so due to missing symbols

2008-10-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-09 12:57 --- Hi Peter, Thanks for mentioning --enable-shared. That was the flag that I was missing when I tried the test the first time. I can now reproduce the problem and I have a patch for you to try out. If it works f

[Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64

2008-10-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-09 13:23 --- Hi Mikael, So - what is the difference between bug.o and bug2.o ? Is it possible to reproduce the bug without using inline assembly ? Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Ad

[Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64

2008-10-09 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Additional Comments From mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2008-10-09 15:02 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi Mikael, > > So - what is the difference between bug.o and bug2.o ? objdump -h bug*.o bug.o: file format pe-x86-64 Sections: Idx Name Size VMA LM

[Bug gas/6944] GNU as manual / GNU as itself is incorrect about dollar local labels

2008-10-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-09 15:10 --- Created an attachment (id=2987) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2987&action=view) Fix documentation -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6944 --- You are receiving this

[Bug gas/6944] GNU as manual / GNU as itself is incorrect about dollar local labels

2008-10-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-10-09 15:12 --- Hi Miro, Thanks for catching this. I am going to apply the uploaded patch to fix the documentation. Cheers Nick gas/ChangeLog 2008-10-09 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR 6944 * doc/as.

[Bug gas/6944] GNU as manual / GNU as itself is incorrect about dollar local labels

2008-10-09 Thread miro dot kropacek at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From miro dot kropacek at gmail dot com 2008-10-09 17:02 --- Hi, no problem. Actually, I was going to submit a patch which respects the LABELS_WITHOUT_COLONS settings also for n$: and n: labels to the source code :) It's part of bigger patch I'm working on so it

[Bug gas/6956] New: When in MRI mode, local labels don't work correctly

2008-10-09 Thread miro dot kropacek at gmail dot com
Take this example code (m68k, MRI mode) xxxglob: dc.w-1 1: nop bra.b 1f ffxxx: dc.w-2 1: nop bra.b 1b it assembles into this: ff ff (-1) 4e 71 (nop) 60 02 (bra.b +2 bytes) ff fe (-2) 4e 71 (nop) 60 f5 (bra -11 bytes, wtf?! it should be b