gas.exp
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-11-14
07:29 ---
Smells like your regsub is broken. The error message indicates that the varName
parameter is needed. It ought to be
regsub ?switches? exp string subSpec ?varName?
ie. var
The test case I hope to be able to attach after submitting this bug is a .o file
generated by a recent g++. In addition to the normal .text section, it has an
out-of-line definition of an inline function foo() in its own section
.text._Z3foov, in section group _Z3foov . (There are no other sections
--- Additional Comments From timb at bluearc dot com 2007-11-14 14:46
---
Created an attachment (id=2088)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2088&action=view)
Test case
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5323
--- You are receiving this mail be
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||andyc at bluearc dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5323
--- You are receiving this m
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-11-14
15:33 ---
This is done deliberately so that groups pass unscathed through ld -r.
Otherwise you'd get .text in group foo being merged with .text in group bar and
with the non-group .text.
--
What|R
--- Additional Comments From timb at bluearc dot com 2007-11-14 15:50
---
But we do want those sections merged. How do we stop them being passed through
unscathed? I can't find any option to control that.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5323
--- You are receivi
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-14 16:31 ---
2 patches are posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00145.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00158.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303
--- You are recei
separate_debug_file_exists() opens the debug info file as a text file on MinGW.
This means it's incorrectly read: CRLF translation takes place and a byte 0x1a
(^Z) is treated as the end of file. This means that it's very unlikely that
separate debug files pass the crc check.
Solution: open the fi
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-11-15
03:46 ---
There is no ld option to do what you want. You would need to modify ldlang.c
unique_section_p.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5323
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-11-15
05:21 ---
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-11/msg00074.html
--
What|Removed |Added
10 matches
Mail list logo