We're using the binutils snapshot from 060815
(ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/binutils/snapshots/) and have a problem building a
crosscompiler from i686 to arm-ep93 with crunch support.
gcc is configured with "--with-arch=ep9312" which is valid for gcc. During the
build, "as" complains about "unknow
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||r dot schwebel at
||pengutronix dot de
http://sourceware.org/bu
--- Additional Comments From mkl at pengutronix dot de 2006-08-15 09:19
---
To be more specific:
the binutils cross-build is successful. the gcc cross-build fails...
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3054
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
The web page indicates that the latest release is 2.14, but the latest
is really 2.17.
When gcc 4.x is built with the linker in binutils 2.14 and emacs is
built from the result, emacs crashes with a segv, which is corrected by
using the '-z nocombreloc' switch. When the linker from 2.17 is used,
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-15 11:59
---
Created an attachment (id=1225)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1225&action=view)
Initialize 'size'
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3039
--- You are receiving this
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-15 12:00
---
Hi Yurii,
Thanks for reporting this problem. It is easily solved by initializing the
size variable, so I am going to apply the uploaded patch to the sources along
with this ChangeLog entry.
Cheers
Nick
binu
Hi George,
The web page indicates that the latest release is 2.14, but the latest
is really 2.17.
Which web page ? Both
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/binutils.html
and
http://sourcewa\re.org/binutils/
Indicate that the latest release is 2.17.
Cheers
Nick
_
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||3071
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2946
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|3071|
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2946
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-15 18:55 ---
Well, my patch is incorrect. It isn't easy to remove the PT_NULL segment.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3015
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-15 21:35 ---
The linker script in question:
.vsyscall_0 -10*1024*1024: AT ((LOADADDR(.data.cacheline_aligned) +
SIZEOF(.data.cacheline_aligned) + 4095) & ~(4095)) { *(.vsyscall_0) }
__vsyscall_0 = LOADADDR(.vsyscall_0);
. =
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-15 21:53 ---
This change
--- ldlang.c.foo2006-08-15 14:53:05.0 -0700
+++ ldlang.c2006-08-15 14:44:19.0 -0700
@@ -4742,11 +4742,14 @@ lang_do_assignments_1 (lang_statement_un
|| (
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-16 00:39 ---
The lma values set by lang_do_assignments_1 are used for
_bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments and those lma values later
are overridden by lang_size_sections_1 with a different logic.
The values set up by lang_do_assignme
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-16 01:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=1226)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1226&action=view)
A testcase
Here is a testcase. old.sec has the dump from the correct output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lma]$ make LD=ld
14 matches
Mail list logo
