Re: typos

Hi Ralf, The attached patches fix some typos, writing inconsistencies, and punctuation issues in the various documentation bits of binutils and subprojects. Thanks very much for submitting these patches, I have applied them along with the ChangeLog entries. Cheers Nick

x86_64 target for Solaris 2.10?

I am trying to build a gdb (6.3) for the x86_64 host/target for Solaris 2.10. BFD does not seem to support x86_64 for Solaris. Is there a different target I could use to configure bfd which would also work on solaris? Thanks, -Tucker Taft [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

[Bug gas/2756] m68k-linux still has #APP/#NO_APP issue

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-24 16:30 --- Hi Lior, Please accept my apologese for taking so long to get back to you on this problem. I have now tried your test case - it does indeed reproduce the problem, and the patch is acceptable, so I have applied

[Bug ld/2729] ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-24 16:48 --- Hi Martin, Sorry for the long delay in responding - work has been really hectic recently. Anyway, I am glad that the patch is workign for you as well. I will check it in to the sources so that it does not ge

Re: [Bug gas/2848] New: macro name syntax changed

Hi Zippel, Until at least 2.15 as accepted a macro like this: .macro foo size,arg,arg2 move\size \arg,\arg2 .endm foo.l %d0,%d1 Another alternative is to restore the old behaviour, which only accepts alphanumeric characters and '_'/'$'. Wou

[Bug gas/2848] macro name syntax changed

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-24 17:01 --- Subject: Re: New: macro name syntax changed Hi Zippel, > Until at least 2.15 as accepted a macro like this: > > .macro foo size,arg,arg2 > move\size \arg,\arg2 > .endm > >

[Bug gas/2848] macro name syntax changed

-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2848 --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug gas/2848] macro name syntax changed

--- Additional Comments From zippel at linux-m68k dot org 2006-07-24 17:32 --- You read it correctly, the intention is to provide the opcodes foo.b/foo.w/foo.l, so using "foo .l" would be even more confusing. The point is that gas broke compatibility here, so I can't provide such opcodes

Re: x86_64 target for Solaris 2.10?

On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:36:50AM -0400, Tucker Taft wrote: > I am trying to build a gdb (6.3) for the x86_64 host/target > for Solaris 2.10. BFD does not seem to support > x86_64 for Solaris. Is there a different target I could > use to configure bfd which would also work on solaris? Try i686-

[Bug binutils/2958] New: FAIL: copy with setting section flags 3

sed -f /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.17.50/src/binutils/testsuite/config/hppa.sed < /xxx/ gnu/binutils-2.17.50/src/binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/bintest.s > asm.s Executing on host: /xxx/gnu/binutils-2.17.50/objdir/gas/as-new asm.s -o tmpdir /bintest.o(timeout = 300) /home/gnu/binutils-2.17.50/objdir/

[Bug ld/2729] ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault]

--- Additional Comments From mkoeppe at gmx dot de 2006-07-24 21:34 --- Hi Nick, > I am intrigued by the absence of the atexit symbol. Looking at the cross > reference files it appears that the Interix linker is obtainign it from a file > called wk_atexit.o. What is this file ? Is i