--- Additional Comments From web-sources dot redhat dot com at
jankratochvil dot net 2006-07-15 07:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=1166)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1166&action=view)
Source for the testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Additional Comments From web-sources dot redhat dot com at
jankratochvil dot net 2006-07-15 07:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=1167)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1167&action=view)
Testcase output from original unpatched objdump
--
http://sourceware.org
--- Additional Comments From web-sources dot redhat dot com at
jankratochvil dot net 2006-07-15 07:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=1168)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1168&action=view)
Testcase output from patched objdump by the H.J.Lu patch
Your patch works fi
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-07-15 16:33 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolut
--- Additional Comments From burgess at impulse dot net 2006-07-15 17:33
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> ...why add extra code to the linker. It just introduces
> more places for bugs to occur and adds complexity...
Agreed, more complexity is the last thing ld needs. Kudos to you and t