--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-24 08:39
---
Created an attachment (id=1047)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1047&action=view)
Add check for missing aux entries
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2659
--- You ar
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-05-24 08:40
---
Hi Anton,
I think that this is a case of a missing check in bfd_coff_link_input_bfd, so
please could you try the uploaded patch and let me know if it works on a real
world test, (ie your build environment).
Che
--- Additional Comments From asl at math dot spbu dot ru 2006-05-24 12:23
---
Unfortunately, patch doesn't work for me. Assertion is still triggered.
I'm attaching the file from the first linker pass (ld -r -o LLVMSelectionDAG.o
ScheduleDAGList.o ScheduleDAGRRList.o).
--
http://sour
--- Additional Comments From asl at math dot spbu dot ru 2006-05-24 12:25
---
Created an attachment (id=1048)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1048&action=view)
Output from the first pass
This is the output from 'ld -r -o LLVMSelectionDAG.o ScheduleDAGList.o
Schedu
--- Additional Comments From asl at math dot spbu dot ru 2006-05-24 12:27
---
Created an attachment (id=1049)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1049&action=view)
The second pass output
The output from the second pass: `ld -r -o LLVMSelectionDAG_1.o
LLVMSelectionDAG.
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-24 15:42 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-05/msg00242.html
--
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-24 15:42 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-05/msg00242.html
--
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-24 15:45 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-04/msg00393.html
--
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-24 15:47 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-04/msg00362.html
--
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-24 15:51 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-05/msg00183.html
--
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-24 15:53 ---
Fixed by
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-04/msg00221.html
--
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Additional Comments From tomri at gmx dot net 2006-05-24 16:25 ---
Well, there's a patch for this "problem" - but this doesn't mean that this patch
is included in the the binutils package.
So, waiting for new binutils package with patch - than you can close this bug.
Thanks.
--
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-24 17:24 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-05/msg00439.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1485
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-24 17:26 ---
Bugzilla is used by binutil developers to fix bugs. If it is fixed in CVS, it
should be closed.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
