It appears that if you have a 64-bit host targetting a 32-bit platform,
the complain_overflow_bitfield case in _bfd_relocate_contents() will
incorrectly generate an overflow error for negative constants. The
"~fieldmask" gives you a whole lot of high one bits (for a 16-bit
bitfield you get 0xf
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:02:25PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> It appears that if you have a 64-bit host targetting a 32-bit platform,
> the complain_overflow_bitfield case in _bfd_relocate_contents() will
The real bug is the 32-bit target using complain_overflow_bitfield on a
32-bit relocatio
