[Bug ld/568] typeinfo for MYTYPE referenced in section FOO of myfile.o: defined in discarded section BAR of foo2.o

2005-06-03 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-06-03 09:59 --- http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2005-06/msg00016.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2005-06/msg00018.html -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug gas/991] operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction

2005-06-03 Thread tom at hukatronic dot cz
--- Additional Comments From tom at hukatronic dot cz 2005-06-03 14:07 --- Created an attachment (id=503) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=503&action=view) source file to trigger this bug -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 --- Yo

[Bug gas/991] New: operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction

2005-06-03 Thread tom at hukatronic dot cz
Cross m68k assembler on powerpc-apple-darwin is not able to assemble following instruction: fmovem.l %fpcr,%d1 Terminal output: [bobik:/tmp] thurka% uname -a Darwin bobik 7.9.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.9.0: Wed Mar 30 20:11:17 PST 2005; root:xnu/xnu -517.12.7.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh p

[Bug gas/991] operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction

2005-06-03 Thread tom at hukatronic dot cz
--- Additional Comments From tom at hukatronic dot cz 2005-06-03 15:04 --- I believe that this bug is caused by two separate problems in gas/config/tc-m68k.c file. First problem is in operands matching against opcode table (function m68k_ip, big for-loop around line 1216). Informat

[Bug gas/991] operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction

2005-06-03 Thread tom at hukatronic dot cz
--- Additional Comments From tom at hukatronic dot cz 2005-06-03 15:51 --- Created an attachment (id=505) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=505&action=view) Proposed patch to fix problem with opcode ordering -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug gas/991] operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction

2005-06-03 Thread tom at hukatronic dot cz
--- Additional Comments From tom at hukatronic dot cz 2005-06-03 15:50 --- Created an attachment (id=504) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=504&action=view) Proposed patch to fix problem with operand matching -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

[Bug ld/992] New: regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf

2005-06-03 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
tmpdir/1.o /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/ld-new -o tmpdir/1.x --gc-sections -Bstatic tmpdir/1.o /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/ld-new: BFD 2.16.91 20050603 internal error, aborting at /home/hp/combined/combined/bfd/elflink.c l\ ine 6446 in elf_link_output_extsym /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/l

[Bug ld/992] regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf

2005-06-03 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-06-04 04:46 --- Created an attachment (id=506) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=506&action=view) selective1 testfile 1.o -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 --- You are re

[Bug ld/992] regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf

2005-06-03 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-06-04 04:47 --- Created an attachment (id=507) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=507&action=view) selective2 testfile 2.o -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 --- You are re

[Bug ld/885] Missing adjustment to the ld-mmix testsuite

2005-06-03 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-06-04 06:10 --- Thanks for adjusting the testsuite (between "Wed May 25 04:52:29 UTC 2005" and "Wed May 25 12:57:20 UTC 2005". It seems you forgot to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to close this PR. -- What|Removed

[Bug ld/992] regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf

2005-06-03 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 06:36 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00030.html -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list f

[Bug ld/992] regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf

2005-06-03 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 06:37 --- I meant this one: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00069.html -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for