Re: reversal of fsubp and fsubrp

2007-11-12 Thread Alan Modra
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 08:03:23AM -0800, dancie wrote: > I have noticed when debugging with gdb that the opcode "de e9" that (in intel > syntax) gdb gives out fsubrp st1,st0. > But according to the intel docs this fsubp st1,st0. I have also noticed that > the opcode for fsubrp st1,st0 gives out >

reversal of fsubp and fsubrp

2007-11-12 Thread dancie
this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reversal-of-fsubp-and-fsubrp-tf4791967.html#a13708176 Sent from the Gnu - Binutils - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman