Re: ld should support --no-fatal-warnings

2008-06-04 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Chris, This turns out to be convenient in cases where one's build system defaults to "ld --fatal-warning" but occasionally one would like to override it. It's also parallel to existing gcc conventions for setting and unsetting options. See attached diff to ld/lexsup.c; it's against 2.17

ld should support --no-fatal-warnings

2008-05-30 Thread Chris Metcalf
This turns out to be convenient in cases where one's build system defaults to "ld --fatal-warning" but occasionally one would like to override it. It's also parallel to existing gcc conventions for setting and unsetting options. See attached diff to ld/lexsup.c; it's against 2.17 but patches