b...@gmx.net writes:
>> The difference in the output appears to be in the strings. This
>> suggests that your compilers are behaving differently than I expect with
>> respect to references to entries in string merge sections. Can you send
>> me just the file TestClass.o? That might be enough fo
Dear gold developers,
Dear Ian,
Being very happy when I read about the new fast linker, I tried to use it on
the package I'm working with (1050229 lines C++, 649866 lines Fortran 90),
together with our preferred toolchain of the Intel C++ and Fortran compiler.
For the linking step itself, I n
tuebened...@yahoo.de writes:
> Not being a linking expert, I assume the object code of fortran
> subroutines is compatible to objects derived from C code. Am I wrong?
Yes, the object code should be compatible.
> ===
> And now for the details: You will fin
