On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:09:04PM +, Mike Murphy wrote:
> I think an example would help explain this. Below is part of the
> output from readelf -h on an elf object I have which has 210016
> sections, but puts the section header string table at section 1. So
> e_shstrndx is 1, but e_shnum is
; bug-binutils@gnu.org
Subject: Re: readelf reporting of e_shstrndx is slightly wrong
Hi Mike,
> If the file has no section name string table, this member holds the value
> |SHN_UNDEF|.
> If the section name string table section index is greater than or
> equal to |SHN_LORESERVE|
Hi,
On 08/21/2018 05:31 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:
if (filedata->section_headers != NULL
&& header->e_shstrndx == (SHN_XINDEX & 0x))
printf (" (%u)", filedata->section_headers[0].sh_link);
else if (header->e_shstrndx != SHN_UNDEF
&& header->e_shst
Hi Mike,
> If the file has no section name string table, this member holds the value
> |SHN_UNDEF|.
> If the section name string table section index is greater than or equal to
> |SHN_LORESERVE| (|0xff00|), this member has the value |SHN_XINDEX| (|0x|)
> The current readelf -h seems to as
