On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:09:24AM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> It's not a 32-bit relocation, it's a 16-bit relocation.
Sorry, I didn't look at your original email carefully enough. I'm
tinkering with a larger patch that removes some other inconsistencies
from reloc.c as well.
--
Alan Modra
IB
It's not a 32-bit relocation, it's a 16-bit relocation.
Chris
On 12/1/2005 12:27 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:02:25PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
It appears that if you have a 64-bit host targetting a 32-bit platform,
the complain_overflow_bitfield case in _bfd_relocate
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:02:25PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> It appears that if you have a 64-bit host targetting a 32-bit platform,
> the complain_overflow_bitfield case in _bfd_relocate_contents() will
The real bug is the 32-bit target using complain_overflow_bitfield on a
32-bit relocatio
