Re: binutils-2.18 on Solaris 2.6 - ld_elf32_sparc_emulation

2007-11-12 Thread Alan Modra
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 04:23:39PM -0800, Gary E Barnes wrote: >local lineno=$[${BASH_LINENO[0]} + 1] > > That line produced "../../binutils-2.18/ld/genscripts.sh: > ${BASH_LINENO[0]} + 1: bad substitution" messages but nothing failed (make > saw no error status). Should be fixed in current

Re: binutils-2.18 on Solaris 2.6 - ld_elf32_sparc_emulation

2007-11-12 Thread Gary E Barnes
hange that line to "local lineno=42" then eelf32_sparc.c is no longer empty and the linking of ld-new completes. Gary Alan Modra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/12/2007 01:42 PM To Gary E Barnes/Cupertino/[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc bug-binutils@gnu.org Subject Re: bi

Re: binutils-2.18 on Solaris 2.6 - ld_elf32_sparc_emulation

2007-11-12 Thread Andreas Schwab
"Gary E. Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The ld-new executable (module ldemul.o) expects ld_elf32_sparc_emulation to > come from somewhere. It apparently does not exist. The only two places in > the source code where that name is present are both in ldemul-list.h. > > ./ld/ldemul-list.h:2:

Re: binutils-2.18 on Solaris 2.6 - ld_elf32_sparc_emulation

2007-11-12 Thread Alan Modra
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 11:39:18AM -0800, Gary E. Barnes wrote: > > The ld-new executable (module ldemul.o) expects ld_elf32_sparc_emulation to > come from somewhere. It apparently does not exist. The only two places in > the source code where that name is present are both in ldemul-list.h. > >