On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:09:29PM +, nick clifton wrote:
> Hi Patrice,
>
> >Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and
> >errors.
> >
> >In my opinion, it falls in the 'minor changes' case with respect to
> >copyright.
>
> Thanks. I have applied your patch along
Hi Patrice,
Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and
errors.
In my opinion, it falls in the 'minor changes' case with respect to
copyright.
Thanks. I have applied your patch along with these changelog entries.
Cheers
Nick
bfd/doc/ChangeLog
2013-01-07 Patri
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 10:27:52AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi Patrice,
>
> > Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and
> > errors.
>
> Core of the patch is
>s/itemx/item/
> right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes.
The patch handles errors/w
Hi Patrice,
> Here is a patch for the binutils cvs that should solve all warnings and
> errors.
Core of the patch is
s/itemx/item/
right? Everything else seems to be unrelated changes.
>
Norbert
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:34:26PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> HI Karl, hi all,
>
> I just came back from Paris, so I cannot provide more details now,
> but it seems that binutils has a problem with the .92 pretest: From
> the build error log (excerpt)
>
> > ../../../binutils/doc/binutils.te
