Re: Possible bug in ld-2.33.90: ld/ldlang.c:3662

2020-05-10 Thread Antonio Ceballos
Ok, thanks for your reply. I should have checked git, sorry! As the fix is on mainline, the next release will include it, which is fair enough. Antonio On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:04 AM Alan Modra wrote: > On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 05:09:18PM +0200, Antonio Ceballos wrote: > > --- ld/ldlang.c

Re: Possible bug in ld-2.33.90: ld/ldlang.c:3662

2020-05-10 Thread Alan Modra
On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 05:09:18PM +0200, Antonio Ceballos wrote: > --- ld/ldlang.c 2020-01-18 14:55:48.0 +0100 > +++ ld/ldlang_new.c 2020-05-09 16:57:21.576153371 +0200 > @@ -3659,7 +3659,7 @@ >if ((ctf_output = ctf_create (&err)) != NULL) > return; > > - einfo (_("%P:

Possible bug in ld-2.33.90: ld/ldlang.c:3662

2020-05-09 Thread Antonio Ceballos
Hello maintainers, While translating ld-2.33.90, I found what could be a bug in ld/ldlang.c:3662. I have written a candidate patch and verified that the patched file passes compilation. You can see it attached. Regards, Antonio Ceballos --- ld/ldlang.c 2020-01-18 14:55:48.0 +0100 +++ ld/