"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, my impression is that the target CPU *can* be specified on the
> command line (via -m), and in that case greater precision is possible.
> I'ld like to update the patch to deal with that. Assuming that the user
> has told us a CPU on the com
I've gotten annoyed enough to want to fix something :-)
The disassembly logic for M68k MOVEC is awful. To do it right requires
knowledge of the actual target CPU model, and we don't have that from
BFD. We *do* have the target architecture level, and we can at least use
that to refine the output.
