https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30376
--- Comment #15 from Pali Rohár ---
Hello, any update for issue in comment #6 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32256
Akhilesh Kumar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22512
--- Comment #2 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Hi,
it seems to me FDPIC support was never implemented in the C library.
I think the default should be changed to Binfmt FLAT.
When I use following patch with binutils 2.44:
diff -Nur binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28530
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
...@developer.gserviceaccount.com added comment #2:
The latest build has succeeded, closing this issue.
___
Reference Info: 408513933 binutils: Fuzzing build failure
component: Public Trackers > 1362134 > OSS Fuzz
status: Verified
reporter: 87...@developer.gserviceaccou
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the
team that works on this product.
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/408513933
Reference Info: 408513933 binutils: Fuzzing build failure
component: Public Trackers > 1362134 > OSS Fuzz
status: New
reporte
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32809
--- Comment #3 from Lynda Rowe ---
That patch definitely seems like it resolves the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32809
Bug ID: 32809
Summary: readelf doesn't dump .debug_loclists section correctly
for 64-bit target and mixed dwarf4/5 content
Product: binutils
Version: 2.45
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32732
--- Comment #9 from Jan Beulich ---
Before marking this resolved, I wonder if the change should be cherry-picked
onto the 2.44 branch (there's likely little point in also putting it on the
2.43 one). Nick?
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32732
--- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=43ea7d00a76eb3a8e30aa91657e535f86e8658c4
commit
Hello,
I am encountering a strange issue with binutils. For context, I am trying to
build gcc 14.2.1_p20250301 for:
--host=aarch64-unknown-linux-android
--target=aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
As part of the build, a target libgcc_s.so is built. For aarch64, a file called
libgcc/config/aarch64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32829
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32829
--- Comment #1 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6c3458a8b7ee7d39f070c7b2350851cb2110c65a
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32829
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32829
Bug ID: 32829
Summary: SEGV on objdump function debug_type_samep
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32732
--- Comment #7 from Bastiaan Timmer ---
Thank you again for your work on this. I can confirm that with the patches
applied the issues I encountered disappear: the libraries are back to their
normal sizes and applications linked to them are abl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090
--- Comment #36 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jens Remus :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=58ed43f97879e80392710030161410534ef57016
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32732
--- Comment #6 from Jan Beulich ---
See https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-March/140249.html for a
hopefully close-to-final patch. Ideally also give it a(nother) try.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090
--- Comment #37 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jens Remus :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=63621cffc5ca44ef9d830f6e562dda5ccbffbeca
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090
--- Comment #38 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jens Remus :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=41f0b410f5dc59ae89b7ec87bc3601d38b2030c8
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090
--- Comment #35 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jens Remus :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=07468ded302ecaec1114f2d5c4d94e05c631f2ac
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21090
--- Comment #34 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jens Remus :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7106a427963462eb5a58e2ece6dc7e4d37132065
commit
#1 from Sam Zeter ---
Patch posted: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-March/140229.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
|NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-March/140085.html
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32732
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
OK, well such a change would certainly be fine with me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32732
--- Comment #4 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3)
> The intention was to allow objcopy's --section-alignment option to not only
> set the SectionAlignment field in the PE format's optional header but to
> also set
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32732
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Right - so first of all I wish to point out that although I did create the
patch that is causing all of these problems, I am not a PE file format expert.
So it is entirely likely that I made mistakes. And
c && gcc
-c -g -O1 -gdwarf-5 -o dwarf5.o dwarf5.c && gcc dwarf4.o dwarf5.o -o a.out
I get sligthly different output for .debug_loc but the same behaviour for the
.debug_loclists section and similarly odd looking header information:
$ ../build2/x86/binutils/readelf -W -wo a.out
Co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32783
Bug ID: 32783
Summary: [RISC-V] Spurious dynamic weakdef symbols in binary
Product: binutils
Version: 2.45 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
--- Comment #19 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ebed0bfecc7f482a2c284947527427625ee42c1a
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13227
Bug 13227 depends on bug 14698, which changed state.
Bug 14698 Summary: ar, nm and ranlib don't use gcc's liblto_plugin.so in
BINDIR/../lib/bfd-plugins automatically
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
What|Re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
--- Comment #17 from LIU Hao ---
(In reply to Jeremy Drake from comment #16)
> I kind of got the impression that section names were limited to 8
> characters. If that's not true, I could use better section names like in
> that merge request.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
--- Comment #18 from Jeremy Drake ---
(In reply to Jeremy Drake from comment #16)
> I've been working on this more, including compatibility with the
> IMAGE_GUARD_DELAYLOAD_IAT_IN_ITS_OWN_SECTION flag. I just looked at the
> https://gitlab.wi
proposed in
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-March/139831.html
I came to wonder what the original purpose of that change was:
--section-alignment, like several other command line options controlling pe_*
variables, is imo supposed to affect PE binaries only. Object files should be
left
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32773
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nick.alcock at oracle dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19153
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14698
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.25
See Also|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
--- Comment #18 from Alan Modra ---
BTW, there are multiple existing tests that exercise the hack added for this
pr. One such is ld-elf/tbss1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32601
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
A tarball of some bad objects may help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32601
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mattst88 at gmail dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32601
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glaubitz at physik dot
fu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sourceware-bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32773
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32773
Bug ID: 32773
Summary: Test failures when -flto is used
Product: binutils
Version: 2.45 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15990|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
--- Comment #14 from LIU Hao ---
Created attachment 15990
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15990&action=edit
proposed patch
This is a patch that makes DLLTOOL emit delay-import data into `.didat` [1]
instead of `.idata`
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32764
--- Comment #6 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d07a59a5ca830bf74705471f6bea6db1a47da2b5
commit d07a59a5ca830bf74705471f6bea6db1a47da2b5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32764
--- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bdf94855597d876836a92ef18d2b6e9290e4e1c0
commit bdf94855597d876836a92ef18d2b6e9290e4e1c0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
--- Comment #17 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3dab78a6866f18bc8023eb1dab88f1276cf9fa26
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32764
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32764
--- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d0bcc49443f44cb47a9c0da11bd1fff4f85296de
commit d0bcc49443f44cb47a9c0da11bd1fff4f85296de
* If user did not specify output style, try to guess something
reasonable. */
if (output_style == 0)
caused the regression. Before this change, entries in symtab.base were updated
by
#0 cg_tally (from_pc=, self_pc=, count=1000)
at /export/gnu/import/git/gitlab/x86-binutils/gprof/ca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32764
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
failures |glibc gmon test failures
||with binutils trunk's gprof
||changes
||(b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
--- Comment #15 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5ccf7a5512db87a8459b90ce2bb25a6aad50cb72
commit 5ccf7a5512db87a8459b90ce2bb25a6aad50cb72
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
--- Comment #13 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9b1e14e5e90ad29d30d2cee9fe6bf3616dcaba70
commit 9b1e14e5e90ad29d30d2cee9fe6bf3616dcaba70
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25237
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://ghc.haskell.org/tra
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glaubitz at physik dot
fu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32408
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |MOVED
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32408
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32383
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32408
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #11 from Marc ---
(In reply to Toolybird from comment #4)
> Hi, Arch Linux bug wrangler here. I've just rebuilt libadwaita with
> binutils-2.44, installed it on a Gnome desktop.. and don't see any problems
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #10 from Marc ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> > they are not functional when executed.
>
> Do they crash on startup? Look wrong? Otherwise malfunction (how)? Can you
> give a backtrace if they crash?
I added the st
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #6 from Marc ---
Created attachment 15982
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15982&action=edit
Archive containing build of libadwaita with binutils 2.44
This archive contains a release and a debug bui
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #9 from Marc ---
Created attachment 15983
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15983&action=edit
Stacktrace of the adwaita-demo-1 built with binutils 2.44
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #8 from Marc ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> Also, does libadwaita's testsuite pass?
Yes, the testsuite passes successfully.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #7 from Marc ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> Which binaries in the libadwaita package differ? Could you upload a bad and
> good tarball, where one is built w/ binutils-2.43.1, and one is built w/
> binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #5 from Marc ---
Created attachment 15981
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15981&action=edit
Archive containing build of libadwaita with binutils 2.43.1
This archive contains a release and a debu
from Toolybird ---
Hi, Arch Linux bug wrangler here. I've just rebuilt libadwaita with
binutils-2.44, installed it on a Gnome desktop.. and don't see any problems
whatsoever.
I suggest this report might be barking up the wrong tree.. and would encourage
the reporter to jump into the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
c reloctions.
>
> But they don't include RELR relocations. One symptom is that
> "objdump -R" doesn't display RELR relocations.
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-February/139696.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|objdump -R: dump SHT_RELR |libbfd doesn't report RELR
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32741
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
> they are not functional when executed.
Do they crash on startup? Look wrong? Otherwise malfunction (how)? Can you give
a backtrace if they crash?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
Also, does libadwaita's testsuite pass?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
from Sam James ---
Which binaries in the libadwaita package differ? Could you upload a bad and
good tarball, where one is built w/ binutils-2.43.1, and one is built w/
binutils-2.44?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32745
Bug ID: 32745
Summary: The ld in binutils 2.44 produces a malfunctioning
libadwaita library
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> Created attachment 15975 [details]
> A patch
Hi H.J.
Well this is a nice idea, but it also raises the issue I pointed out in
comment #1. Code like this makes th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nickc at redhat dot com|hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.44
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32741
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |2.44
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32741
Bug ID: 32741
Summary: readelf -r -D doesn't dump DT_RELR relocations
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
OK, so I have checked in a simplified version of the patch which only issues an
information message when RELR relocs are present and other relocs are not. It
also does not change the behaviour when using -
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
--- Comment #5 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c619e92beb0784775552abe64d9a886a8cdc7236
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
--- Comment #4 from Fangrui Song ---
Sorry again for the late reply.
Since objdump -r ignores dynamic relocations, I think it is consistent to not
report a warning when .relr.dyn is present.
% objdump -r /bin/ls
/bin/ls: file format elf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
--- Comment #23 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_43-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fde801554cbd66625cddfe1a79e353e757ce177e
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32732
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--
You are recei
|--- |2.45
Summary|Binutils (objcopy) |Binutils (objcopy)
|generates abnormally large, |generates abnormally large,
|non-functional binaries |non-functional binaries
||since
1 - 100 of 9480 matches
Mail list logo
