[Bug gas/32528] New: Different codegen between `mov al, byte [rdi]` and `mov al, [rdi]`

2025-01-07 Thread taolzu at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32528 Bug ID: 32528 Summary: Different codegen between `mov al, byte [rdi]` and `mov al, [rdi]` Product: binutils Version: 2.43 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug gas/32528] Different codegen between `mov al, byte [rdi]` and `mov al, [rdi]`

2025-01-07 Thread taolzu at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32528 Lzu Tao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||taolzu at gmail dot com -- You are receivi

[Bug gas/27096] [ARM] If-Then instruction and AL condition

2022-06-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27096 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.35.1 |2.35 -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug ld/21472] [avr] Add new emulation for ATtiny416 et al.

2021-09-27 Thread dianeBerlusconi at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21472 Roman Jay Almaza changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dianeBerlusconi at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/21472] [avr] Add new emulation for ATtiny416 et al.

2021-09-10 Thread mehmetgelisin at aol dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21472 Mehmet gelisin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mehmetgelisin at aol dot com --- Com

[Bug gas/27096] New: [ARM] If-Then instruction and AL condition

2020-12-19 Thread kordalski.wojciech at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27096 Bug ID: 27096 Summary: [ARM] If-Then instruction and AL condition Product: binutils Version: 2.35.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Bug ld/21472] [avr] Add new emulation for ATtiny416 et al.

2019-04-30 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21472 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/21472] [avr] Add new emulation for ATtiny416 et al.

2017-07-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21472 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f27dadca0ad18d5a0ba032c3d3f6a60ea55d887b commit f27dadca0ad18d5a0ba032c3d3f

[Bug ld/21472] [avr] Add new emulation for ATtiny416 et al.

2017-07-03 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21472 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 10237 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10237&action=edit binutils-avrxmega3-pr21472-doc.diff: Round-up of documentation. gas/ PR ld/21472 * con

[Bug ld/21472] [avr] Add new emulation for ATtiny416 et al.

2017-05-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21472 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f4203b2b8830e66e5229b7f9d30cd29b088566b5 commit f4203b2b8830e66e5229b7f9d30

[Bug ld/21472] [avr] Add new emulation for ATtiny416 et al.

2017-05-08 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21472 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Created attachment 10041 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10041&action=edit binutils-avrxmega3.diff: Proposed patch ld/ Upgrade the currently unused emulation avrxmega3 t

[Bug ld/21472] [avr] Add new emulation for ATtiny416 et al.

2017-05-08 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21472 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Priority|P2

[Bug ld/21472] New: [avr] Add new emulation for ATtiny416 et al.

2017-05-08 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21472 Bug ID: 21472 Summary: [avr] Add new emulation for ATtiny416 et al. Product: binutils Version: 2.29 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Bug gas/2950] mov %al, 0x16 generates the wrong opcode

2006-07-23 Thread justin at mail2justme dot com
--- Additional Comments From justin at mail2justme dot com 2006-07-23 10:39 --- Whoops... Sorry about that. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2950 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug gas/2950] mov %al, 0x16 generates the wrong opcode

2006-07-21 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-07-22 06:02 --- You are mistaken on two counts. Firstly, the second operand is the destination in AT&T mode. Secondiy, an unadorned number such as 0x16 is an address. A2 is the correct opcode. -- What|

[Bug gas/2950] New: mov %al, 0x16 generates the wrong opcode

2006-07-21 Thread justin at mail2justme dot com
mov %al, 0x16 generates the opcode A2 which is actually the opcode for mov moffs8*, al (move al to segment:offset). The correct opcode is B0 (mov r8, imm8) Reference: Intel Instruction Set Reference Volume 1. -- Summary: mov %al, 0x16 generates the wrong opcode Product

Re: -al

2006-03-11 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Daniel, *** main (int argc, char ** argv) *** 1205,1211 keep_it = 0; if (!keep_it) ! unlink_if_ordinary (out_file_name); input_scrub_end (); --- 1206,1212 keep_it = 0; if (!keep_it) ! unlink (out_file_name); input_scrub_end ();

Re: -al

2006-03-10 Thread George M. Gallant, Jr.
Daniel, I don't understand the context of you question. The patch from Nick seems to fix my concern. George On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 13:22 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:19:56AM +, Nick Clifton wrote: > *** main (int argc, char ** argv) > *** 1205,1

Re: -al

2006-03-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:40:18PM -0500, George M. Gallant, Jr. wrote: > Daniel, > > I don't understand the context of you question. The patch from Nick > seems to > fix my concern. Right - it was directed at Nick. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery ___

Re: -al

2006-03-10 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:19:56AM +, Nick Clifton wrote: > *** main (int argc, char ** argv) > *** 1205,1211 > keep_it = 0; > > if (!keep_it) > ! unlink_if_ordinary (out_file_name); > > input_scrub_end (); > > --- 1206,1212 > keep_it = 0;

Re: -al

2006-03-10 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi George, I have been using the -al=file to generate assembler listing files. In version 2.16 this is being interpreted as --alternate. Oops - sorry - please ignore my previous post. I missed that you were using the '=file' syntax. When I added that to the command line of my

Re: -al

2006-03-08 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi George, I have been using the -al=file to generate assembler listing files. In version 2.16 this is being interpreted as --alternate. I am unable to reproduce this problem, either using the 2.16 branch sources or the current CVS mainline sources. For example: % arm-elf-gas -al nop.s

-al

2006-03-07 Thread George M. Gallant, Jr
I have been using the -al=file to generate assembler listing files. In version 2.16 this is being interpreted as --alternate. George ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils