https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.41
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
Jordan Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jordan at jwillikers dot com
--
Yo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_41-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=74e20e445b358c2f6884ab29cd832561a178e646
commit 74e20e445b358c2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #8 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
That fixes the intermediate build issue, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5f60df9974516867c02562b56c3a98cf4714a915
commit 5f60df9974516867c02562b56c3a9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Slowly showing up on other builds as well: i686-pc-msdosdjgpp
(http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/binutils-i686-pc-msdosdjgpp/38)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--- Comment #5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
> In the original report I suggested using the existing lto_output flag to
> distinguish > this (for ld.bfd) -- is there any reason why that wouldn't work?
That makes much more sense. Sorry for not readi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b25c1a15cbac78e592d7a0c749dec2fcc175ec39
commit b25c1a15cbac78e592d7a0c749d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #2 from Nikita Popov ---
Thanks for the patch!
> I have a couple of concerns with the patch. The first is that it uses a
> simple heuristic to detect LTO generated filenames. I have no idea how
> robust this will be.
Yes, I ag
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 14940
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14940&action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi Nikita,
Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know what you think.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
Assi
12 matches
Mail list logo