[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2025-06-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.41 Resolution|---

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-07-31 Thread jordan at jwillikers dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 Jordan Williams changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jordan at jwillikers dot com -- Yo

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-07-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_41-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=74e20e445b358c2f6884ab29cd832561a178e646 commit 74e20e445b358c2

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-07-06 Thread jbg...@lug-owl.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 --- Comment #8 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- That fixes the intermediate build issue, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-07-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5f60df9974516867c02562b56c3a98cf4714a915 commit 5f60df9974516867c02562b56c3a9

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-07-05 Thread jbg...@lug-owl.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 --- Comment #6 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- Slowly showing up on other builds as well: i686-pc-msdosdjgpp (http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/laminar/jobs/binutils-i686-pc-msdosdjgpp/38) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-07-05 Thread jbg...@lug-owl.de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 Jan-Benedict Glaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de --- Comment #5

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-06-28 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- > In the original report I suggested using the existing lto_output flag to > distinguish > this (for ld.bfd) -- is there any reason why that wouldn't work? That makes much more sense. Sorry for not readi

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-06-28 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b25c1a15cbac78e592d7a0c749dec2fcc175ec39 commit b25c1a15cbac78e592d7a0c749d

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-06-27 Thread npopov at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 --- Comment #2 from Nikita Popov --- Thanks for the patch! > I have a couple of concerns with the patch. The first is that it uses a > simple heuristic to detect LTO generated filenames. I have no idea how > robust this will be. Yes, I ag

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-06-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 14940 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14940&action=edit Proposed patch Hi Nikita, Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know what you think.

[Bug ld/30568] --dependency-file includes temporary LTO files

2023-06-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30568 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com Assi