--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-08 16:09 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolut
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 15:59
---
Subject: Re: --sort-section name is brorken
Hi H.J.
> I think it is wrong. The problem is handler_data [1] is used for 2 things,
> wildcard first. And then it was treated as tree later. I added 2 new tests
> tod
Hi H.J.
I think it is wrong. The problem is handler_data [1] is used for 2 things,
wildcard first. And then it was treated as tree later. I added 2 new tests
today. I think one of them may fail with your patch. I posted a patch at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-08/msg00080.html
Ah - r
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-08 15:14 ---
I think it is wrong. The problem is handler_data [1] is used for 2 things,
wildcard first. And then it was treated as tree later. I added 2 new tests
today. I think one of them may fail with your patch. I posted a patc
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 14:05
---
Hi H.J.
I am probably wrong, but this looks like a simple case of a missing check for
a NULL pointer. The uploaded patch for example allows your test case to link
successfully. What do you think ?
Cheers
Ni
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-08-08 14:04
---
Created an attachment (id=1213)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1213&action=view)
Check for a tree node with no section specified
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3006
