[Bug ld/28622] Common symbol version information wrong in ld.bfd-linked library

2022-06-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28622 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.35.2 |2.35 -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug ld/28622] Common symbol version information wrong in ld.bfd-linked library

2021-12-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28622 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug ld/28622] Common symbol version information wrong in ld.bfd-linked library

2021-12-07 Thread tbaeder at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28622 Timm Bäder changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ld/28622] Common symbol version information wrong in ld.bfd-linked library

2021-11-24 Thread tbaeder at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28622 --- Comment #2 from Timm Bäder --- Ok, with current ld.bfd from the master branch, I get lib1.so: file format elf64-x86-64 DYNAMIC SYMBOL TABLE: w D *UND* Base _ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable 00

[Bug ld/28622] Common symbol version information wrong in ld.bfd-linked library

2021-11-24 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28622 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- This does not reproduce for me on any upstream version of binutils I tried. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.