[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

2019-10-19 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

2019-10-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1c1a69dcaeb01037f3191a5ebf1b2f9c0dcbe7a3 commit 1c1a69dcaeb01037f3191a

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

2019-10-16 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- OK, I'm leaving it up to you to apply whichever of these patches you prefer.. Yours has this to recommend it in being similar to other target hacks in gc.exp. -- You are receiving this mail because: You ar

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

2019-10-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin --- The "possible fix" works for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

2019-10-16 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 12043 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12043&action=edit Patch This is a horrible hack to avoid $$dyncall being called when using gcc-9 and gcc-10, but I wasn

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

2019-10-16 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 12042 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12042&action=edit possible fix This patch should allow the test to pass. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

2019-10-16 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-10-16 7:33 a.m., John David Anglin wrote: > Final executables always need to be linked against the millicode library on > hppa to provide $$dyncall > and various arithmetic operations

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

2019-10-16 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-10-15 10:23 p.m., amodra at gmail dot com wrote: > Works for me with hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.1 20180502 It's probably because I recently changed the optimization of indirect calls in

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

2019-10-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 f