https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
--- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0e0dd7f1e8b64efff9a981d0421ffeaeff70cd20
commit 0e0dd7f1e8b64efff9a981d0421f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
--- Comment #12 from Dirkjan Ochtman ---
That sounds like a nice improvement, thanks for implementing!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|amodra at gmail dot com|
Resolution|INVALID
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
--- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bf2dd8d7cf4114b8a60dbb83b340f76b9b2474d1
commit bf2dd8d7cf4114b8a60dbb83b340
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
--- Comment #9 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #8)
> > Gentoo has two libbfd-2.30.0.so libraries with incompatible ABIs:
> > One of them is built --enable-64-bit-bfd, then other is not
>
> Ouch, that would exp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
--- Comment #6 from Alan J. Wylie ---
Upgraded binutils from 2.30-r2 to 2.31.1
Firefox now builds
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils maili
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
--- Comment #5 from Dirkjan Ochtman ---
One of the bug reporters is now saying the problem went away after upgrading to
binutils-2.31.1. Is that halfway plausible given the changes between those
releases?
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
One of you who can manage to reproduce this bug will need to spend a little
time using gdb to find out what is going on. If I had a reproducible test
case, I'd
a) Run the failing link with "-save-temps -v -W
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
Alan J. Wylie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m4ntdjzdi2 at wylie dot me.uk
--- Com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
--- Comment #2 from Dirkjan Ochtman ---
Yes, that appears to be the one.
This is reproducible (happens every time), and the user has seen it on two
separate machines -- one running on bare metal, the other a VM running on a
machine with ECC m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
13 matches
Mail list logo
