[Bug ld/22423] PT_PHDR segment is marked with PF_X

2017-11-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22423 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/22423] PT_PHDR segment is marked with PF_X

2017-11-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22423 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f882209d9aa5b68d68c45c5849e129ffc228749c commit f882209d9aa5b68d68c45c5849e129ff

[Bug ld/22423] PT_PHDR segment is marked with PF_X

2017-11-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22423 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #1) > > It was reasonable 20 years ago. > > Normally PT_PHDR overlaps with the first PT_LOAD. > > If you keep that, the flags on PT_PHDR don't matter (the first PT_LOA

[Bug ld/22423] PT_PHDR segment is marked with PF_X

2017-11-11 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22423 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com --- C