https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
Bug 19011 depends on bug 26659, which changed state.
Bug 26659 Summary: x86_64 pe relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against
undefined symbol
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26659
What|Removed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||26659
Referen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
Bug 19011 depends on bug 26588, which changed state.
Bug 26588 Summary: enable-reloc-section on .exe with no exported symbols causes
segfault if requested to create implib
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26588
What
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|26588 |
Depen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||26588
Referen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
Bug 19011 depends on bug 26587, which changed state.
Bug 26587 Summary: [2.36 Regression] UNRESOLVED: objcopy executable
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26587
What|Removed |Added
-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||26587
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #26 from sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com ---
> #define NT_DLL_AUTO_IMAGE_MASK \
> ((bfd_vma) (${move_default_addr_high} ? 0x1LL \
>- : 0x0ffcLL))
>+
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #25 from sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com ---
(In reply to sourceware-bugzilla from comment #24)
I'm not sure if these are recommending documentation updates or changes to
defaults, but if the latter...
> > +@itemx --disable-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #24 from sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com ---
(In reply to cvs-com...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #14)
> The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;
> h=514b4
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #23 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6194b866b7a89969d8c66f8a97d40acc028373b1
commit 6194b866b7a89969d8c66f8a97
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #22 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=16f9c644c7fcec6f4aa6f4e8a1458b57d2b28982
commit 16f9c644c7fcec6f4aa6f4e8a145
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #21 from Alan Modra ---
It turned out that the regressions were caused by the change to default image
base. I'll commit a fix after running a few tests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #20 from Alan Modra ---
>From ld.log before/after the patch it looks like all of the regressions on
x86_64-w64-mingw32 are due to additional "relocation truncated to fit" errors.
good:
./ld-new -o tmpdir/pr20070.x
-L/home/alan/
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #19 from sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com ---
Perhaps the default enabling of --enable-reloc-section should have been more
limited? That was a last-minute change on my part, when I noticed the
executables I built were not actu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #18 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #17)
> It also fixed these by removing the "zero vma section reloc detected" error,
> where no --just-symbols was involved so I'm not sure this is a good thing.
Ah - I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #17 from Alan Modra ---
It also fixed these by removing the "zero vma section reloc detected" error,
where no --just-symbols was involved so I'm not sure this is a good thing.
sh-pe +FAIL: objcopy executable (pr25662)
sh-pe -FAI
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #16 from Alan Modra ---
This patch apparently caused
x86_64-w64-mingw32 +FAIL: plugin claimfile lost symbol
x86_64-w64-mingw32 +FAIL: plugin claimfile replace file
x86_64-w64-mingw32 +FAIL: plugin error
x86_64-w64-mingw32 +FAIL
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #15 from Nick Clifton ---
Thanks Jeremy - I have now applied your two patches. I made two small
additions - documenting the new options in ld/ld.texi and mentioning the change
in linker behaviour in the ld/NEWS file. I also had t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=514b4e191d5f46de8e142fe216e677a35fa9c4bb
commit 514b4e191d5f46de8e142fe216
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #12802|0 |1
is ob
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #12801|0 |1
is ob
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #11 from sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com ---
Created attachment 12801
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12801&action=edit
[PATCH 2/2] LD/PR19011: more secure default PE options.
--
You are receiving thi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sourceware-bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #9 from Hannes Domani ---
(In reply to Alex Smith from comment #0)
> Furthermore if you specify dynamicbase it should automatically cause the
> linker to output a reloc section (or not strip it or however it works
> internally).
T
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #8 from gerald at wireshark dot org
---
Googling for "mingw-w64 aslr" turned up a CERT vulnerability note[1] for this
issue along with CVE-2018-5392. It wasn't apparent from the VN or the CVE
whether or not Sourceware had been not
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #7 from Tom Ritter ---
This is a big drive-by, as I don't have much understanding on the details of
the problem; but Tor uses the following patch to add a relocation section so
Windows builds of Tor Browser can have ASLR:
https://g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #6 from hugo at beauzee dot fr ---
Well, apparently the attached fixes the header, but makes windows fail to run
the resulting executable, so I guess something's missing.
Any help would be appreciated!
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #5 from hugo at beauzee dot fr ---
The attached patch fixes the IMAGE_FILE_RELOCS_STRIPPED bit to be set in the
headers when no symbol is exported, when building with -Wl,--dynamicbase.
Please let me know if some corrections are t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
hugo at beauzee dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hugo at beauzee dot fr
--- C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
Tom Ritter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at ritter dot vg
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
Domani Hannes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssbssa at yahoo dot de
--
You are re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
gerald at wireshark dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at wireshark dot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clif
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #2 from Alex Smith ---
I don't mind having a go but I'm unfamiliar with the binutils/ld source so I'll
have to figure out where everything is first.
On that note are you (or anyone who might be able to help) on irc?
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
36 matches
Mail list logo