https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18829
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18829
--- Comment #7 from Greg Bentley ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> (In reply to Greg Bentley from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> > > As I understand, for further benefit you should sort the GOT as w
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18829
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Greg Bentley from comment #5)
> (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> > As I understand, for further benefit you should sort the GOT as well as PLT
> > based on the same idea — and that
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18829
--- Comment #5 from Greg Bentley ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> As I understand, for further benefit you should sort the GOT as well as PLT
> based on the same idea — and that will save you some dcache misses even with
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18829
Greg Bentley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8524|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18829
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18829
Jevin Sweval changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsweval at arxan dot com
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18829
--- Comment #2 from Greg Bentley ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Have you tried -fno-plt option in GCC 6? It removes PLT
> and calls external functions via GOT directly.
No, I hadn't heard of that option. Thanks for the pointer.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18829
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
