[Bug gold/10916] Interprets --exclude-libs completely different to old GNU ld

2009-12-31 Thread robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de
--- Additional Comments From robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de 2009-12-31 12:13 --- Weird that that information is missing. I thought that I just copied the bugreport from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555012 were you can see the --exclude-libs in the command line.

[Bug gold/10916] Interprets --exclude-libs completely different to old GNU ld

2009-12-30 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2009-12-31 01:17 --- I think I've spotted the problem. I committed a patch for it. Please let me know if you still have problems with this. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug gold/10916] Interprets --exclude-libs completely different to old GNU ld

2009-12-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-31 01:14 --- Subject: Bug 10916 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: i...@sourceware.org 2009-12-31 01:14:34 Modified files: gold : ChangeLog symtab.cc gold/tes

[Bug gold/10916] Interprets --exclude-libs completely different to old GNU ld

2009-12-30 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2009-12-31 00:28 --- Thanks for the bug report. I can't help but notice that though you mention -- exclude-libs in the description, you aren't actually using it in the link command line. Still I will look to see if I can spot a differen

[Bug gold/10916] Interprets --exclude-libs completely different to old GNU ld

2009-11-08 Thread robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |ian at airs dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW

[Bug gold/10916] Interprets --exclude-libs completely different to old GNU ld

2009-11-07 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|gold http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10916 --- You are receiving this mail because: --