--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-04
19:47 ---
verified by doing local glibc-cvs build
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-04
19:46 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Subject: Re: GAS errors on valid code complaining missing.cfi_endproc
>
> Hi Khem,
>
> Jakub has just checked in a patch that should fix this:
>
>2006-12-02 Jakub Jelin
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-12-04 10:36
---
Subject: Re: GAS errors on valid code complaining missing .cfi_endproc
Hi Khem,
Jakub has just checked in a patch that should fix this:
2006-12-02 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR gas/360
Hi Khem,
Jakub has just checked in a patch that should fix this:
2006-12-02 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR gas/3607
* subsegs.c (subseg_set_rest): Clear frch_cfi_data field.
Please could you update your sources, reapply your local patch (if
necessary) and verify whet
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3607
--- You are receiving this ma
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-01
22:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=1446)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1446&action=view)
the patch that uncovers the reported issue
This patch when applied on top of cvs sources produces the
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-01
22:33 ---
Hi Nick
Yes its not reproducible with cvs binutils. I realised that after a while. Its
one of the local patches I apply
than this issue happens. This has been working.
I debugged gas a bit.
My patch ca
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-12-01 12:18
---
Hi Khem,
I could not reproduce this. I tried with these targets:
x86_64-linux
i686-pc-linux-gnu
powerpc-eabisim(Changing "negl %eax" to "nop")
They all assembled your test case correctly. Please could