https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2848
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--- Additional Comments From zippel at linux-m68k dot org 2006-07-28 17:32
---
BTW while looking through the source it may make sense to disable the dot
completely on m68k as part of the name. It's not really valid as part of any
symbol name, e.g. label.w has a special meaning.
Although
--- Additional Comments From zippel at linux-m68k dot org 2006-07-26 11:21
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> OK, so presumably a workaround is to provide individual macros with the
> names "foo.b", "foo.w" and so on, rather than just one macro.
This is not possible, if it has to work wit
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-26 10:42
---
Created an attachment (id=1185)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1185&action=view)
Add new GAS command line switch --no-dot-in-macro-names
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-26 10:41
---
Subject: Re: macro name syntax changed
Hi Roman,
> You read it correctly, the intention is to provide the opcodes
> foo.b/foo.w/foo.l, so using "foo .l" would be even more confusing.
OK, so presumably a workaro
Hi Roman,
You read it correctly, the intention is to provide the opcodes
foo.b/foo.w/foo.l, so using "foo .l" would be even more confusing.
OK, so presumably a workaround is to provide individual macros with the
names "foo.b", "foo.w" and so on, rather than just one macro.
The point is tha
--- Additional Comments From zippel at linux-m68k dot org 2006-07-24 17:32
---
You read it correctly, the intention is to provide the opcodes
foo.b/foo.w/foo.l, so using "foo .l" would be even more confusing. The point is
that gas broke compatibility here, so I can't provide such opcodes
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2848
--- You are receiving this mail because:
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-07-24 17:01
---
Subject: Re: New: macro name syntax changed
Hi Zippel,
> Until at least 2.15 as accepted a macro like this:
>
> .macro foo size,arg,arg2
> move\size \arg,\arg2
> .endm
>
>
