https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189
--- Comment #6 from David Howells ---
Works for me, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f66adc4eada1884cef90aa978561b9b2008cdaf2
commit f66adc4eada1884cef90aa97856
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=03e080386e266243b2af667af026b992822085cd
commit 03e080386e266243b2af667af02
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189
--- Comment #2 from David Howells ---
binutils-2.25 was the base, plus patches as for the Fedora 21 binutils rpm.
The configuration for the x86_64 binutils was:
LDFLAGS='-Wl,-z,relro ' \
../binutils-2.25/configure --disable-dependency-tracki
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189
--- Comment #1 from David Howells ---
Created attachment 8221
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8221&action=edit
Preprocessed libgcc C file
For reference, here's the preprocessed libgcc file that compiles to the
previous
