--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 17:54 ---
I will submit the kernel patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 17:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=690)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=690&action=view)
A 2.6 kernel patch
This patch for 2.6 kernel works for me.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 08:54
---
*** Bug 1434 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1433
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, o
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-10-07 06:53
---
Subject: Re: IA64 assembler generates bad 2.6.9 Linux kernel.
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 04:32 +, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 04:32
> ---
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 04:32 +, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 04:32
> ---
> Will this kernel change fix the kernel? Will this kernel change work with
> the old assembler?
The patch will work regardless of what slot the assem
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-07 04:32 ---
Will this kernel change fix the kernel? Will this kernel change work with
the old assembler?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1433
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on t
--- Additional Comments From rth at redhat dot com 2005-10-07 01:52 ---
Subject: Re: IA64 assembler generates bad 2.6.9 Linux kernel.
> 2) Why does the kernel care whether we use slot 1 or slot 2 here?
It's got some runtime code patching code that assumes it.
> Maybe the kernel can be
--- Additional Comments From rth at redhat dot com 2005-10-07 01:37 ---
Subject: Re: IA64 assembler generates bad 2.6.9 Linux kernel.
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:18:37AM -, wilson at specifix dot com wrote:
> 1) Why did Richard move the code? Did he run into some problem with the
>
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2005-10-07 01:18
---
Subject: Re: IA64 assembler generates bad 2.6.9 Linux kernel.
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 16:24, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> - 0001004d R_IA64_PCREL32LSB .text + 2
> +
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 16:24, hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> - 0001004d R_IA64_PCREL32LSB .text + 2
> + 0001004d R_IA64_PCREL32LSB .text + 1
This seems to be an old debate reborn. When we have relocs, tags, debug
info, whatever tha
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-06 23:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=687)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=687&action=view)
A simpler testcase
The problem is in tag handling:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dwarf2-2]$ make
./new-as -x -mconstant-gp -o
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-06 23:20 ---
It seems that the new assembler doesn't handle tag correctly.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1433
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-10-06 23:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=686)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=686&action=view)
A testcase
"new-as" is the bad as and "old-as" is the good one without the patch. I got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dwarf2-
13 matches
Mail list logo
