[Bug binutils/747] Profiling of nested functions

2020-01-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=747 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW -- You are receiving this mail becaus

[Bug binutils/747] Profiling of nested functions

2006-03-16 Thread bje at sources dot redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-17 01:50 --- Changing to an enhancement request. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal

[Bug binutils/747] Profiling of nested functions

2005-03-15 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-03-15 20:20 --- Thanks Nick for your answer. I missed the -l flag in the documentation, very useful indeed! The per "line" profile looks indeed correct, but the call graph suffers from this nested=parent assimilation and shows

[Bug binutils/747] Profiling of nested functions

2005-03-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-03-15 16:34 --- Hi Laurent, This is not a bug but rather a feature of gprof. It considers nested functions to be part of their parent function and by default it will include their timing in their parent's total. You can get t

[Bug binutils/747] Profiling of nested functions

2005-02-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://sources.redhat.com/bugz