--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-29
01:48 ---
This is now fixed for builds with gcc by the following change:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00160.html
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-28
19:55 ---
Native build with gcc 4.2.2 on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 fails:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/bf
d -I. -DHOST_HPPAHPUX -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -DHPUX_CORE -DHPUX_LAR
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-16 15:18
---
Patches checked in with this ChangeLog entry.
bfd/ChangeLog
2007-10-16 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR 5146
* configure.in (AC_CHECK_HEADERS): Add alloca.h
* configure: Regenerate.
--- Additional Comments From haubi at gentoo dot org 2007-10-16 15:05
---
Hi Nick,
> Well bum. OK, I'll check your patch in as well as mine, and that should take
> care of it, right ?
Yep - both bfd/som.c and bfd/elf64-hppa.c get "config.h" through "sysdep.h" -
should work.
And you d
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-16 14:55
---
Subject: Re: bfd build fails in alloca-conf.h when built
without gcc
Hi Haubi,
> Currently bfd/configure does _not_ check for - IMO this still is
> required, as that patch tests HAVE_ALLOCA_H too.
Well bum.
Hi Haubi,
Currently bfd/configure does _not_ check for - IMO this still is
required, as that patch tests HAVE_ALLOCA_H too.
Well bum. OK, I'll check your patch in as well as mine, and that should take
care of it, right ?
Cheers
Nick
___
bu
--- Additional Comments From haubi at gentoo dot org 2007-10-16 14:44
---
Well, compiling bfd/som.c succeeded, so the patch for bfd/som.c seems ok.
But linking the first executable in binutils/ now gives:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -Wp,-H256000 -g -o size size.o
bucomm
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-16 14:16
---
Subject: Re: bfd build fails in alloca-conf.h when built
without gcc
Hi Haubi,
> With this patch only (without checking for in bfd/configure), the
> next unknown symbol is 'size_t':
Doh.
> Eh, in gas/ChangeL
Hi Haubi,
With this patch only (without checking for in bfd/configure), the
next unknown symbol is 'size_t':
Doh.
Eh, in gas/ChangeLog-9295 there is this log entry: "Replace alloca-conf.h
inclusion with code recommended in autoconf documentation."
Maybe this should be done for bfd too ?
--- Additional Comments From haubi at gentoo dot org 2007-10-15 09:51
---
Hi Nick,
(In reply to comment #1)
> Fixing the bfd configure script so that the system alloca.h is used instead
> does not seem to me to be sufficient - the problem can still arise in other
> build directories.
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-12 16:47
---
Subject: Re: New: bfd build fails in alloca-conf.h when
built without gcc
Hi Michael,
> When building binutils-2.18 with native cc on hppa-hpux11.11,
> include/alloca-conf.h fails to correctly include , or to d
11 matches
Mail list logo
