[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-15 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-15 12:16 --- Works fine now. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-15 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-05-15 11:58 --- This ought to cure the ia64 fallout. http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-05/msg00079.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4479 --- You are receiving this mail because: --

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-14 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4479 --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-14 Thread schwab at suse dot de
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|4144| nThis|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4479 --

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-14 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-14 13:43 --- The removed program headers now breaks ia64: BFD: a.debug: warning: allocated section `.IA_64.unwind' not in segment The .IA_64.unwind section has SHT_IA64_UNWIND instead of SHT_NOBITS in the output. --

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-11 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-05-11 15:11 --- Further fix to completely remove headers http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-05/msg00060.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4479 --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-11 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-11 10:57 --- Fixed by . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-10 Thread bernhard dot walle at gmx dot de
-- What|Removed |Added CC||bernhard dot walle at gmx ||dot de http://sourceware.org/bugzil

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-09 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-05-10 07:00:24 date|

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-09 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-05-10 07:00 --- http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-05/msg00132.html -- What|Removed |Added Ass

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-09 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-05-10 06:52 --- Probably not deliberate. It came with 2004-05-17 David Heine. I can't see that there is any need for program headers in the debug info file anyway. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-09 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-05-10 03:16 --- I'd say that the p_memsz values were "wrong" before my patch. It's also interesting to look at what older objcopy does. eg. 2.15 objcopy --only-keep-debug does this Program Headers: Type Offs

[Bug binutils/4479] objcopy --only-keep-debug broken

2007-05-09 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-09 17:55 --- To reproduce the bug (where objcopy.old has the patch for PR4144 reverted): $ cat hello.c #include int main (void) { printf ("Hello, world!\n"); } $ gcc -g hello.c -o hello $ objcopy.old --only-keep-debug hello h