[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice

2023-02-07 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30080 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5) > See commit a3b6428fe79. .comment and .note eh ? I wonder why they would have symbols ? Still fair enough, such symbols can obviously be produced. I stand b

[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice

2023-02-07 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30080 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- See commit a3b6428fe79. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice

2023-02-07 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30080 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice

2023-02-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30080 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3a8be578d658b1cad3579aea0f5ce4883de21e6b commit 3a8be578d658b1cad3579aea0f5

[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice

2023-02-06 Thread tromey at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30080 --- Comment #2 from Tom Tromey --- Thanks Nick. That looks good to me. I also wonder if that could ever happen. Maybe it's possible for some format but not ELF? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice

2023-02-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30080 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com