https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_40-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=48d455786ce177ed8f8ebe4a868581f591ad81b5
commit 48d455786ce177e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=02da71ee20ec71f7b3be85cf2266e09c124983bf
commit 02da71ee20ec71f7b3be85cf2266e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-01-08
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
--- Comment #5 from Bruno Haible ---
> As gettext enhancement could be added check on extract time. But this is
> feature request, with very low severity and zero priority.
Registered at https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63630 .
--
You are rec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
--- Comment #4 from Roumen Petrov ---
Work-around means in translated singular form, i.e., msgstr[0] to use PRIu64
instead PRId64.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
--- Comment #3 from Roumen Petrov ---
Hi Bruno,
I would like to inform you about such kind of errors in gettext use. Definitely
it is developer error, not gettext!
As gettext enhancement could be added check on extract time. But this is
feat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
--- Comment #2 from Bruno Haible ---
> Work-around: to update translated text to use PRIu64 format.
I don't know what you mean. The bug is not the translation; the bug is in the
source code that led to the POT file with this contents:
#: rea
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
--- Comment #1 from Roumen Petrov ---
Let see code
printf (ngettext ("\nDynamic section at offset %#" PRIx64 " contains %"
PRId64 " entry:\n",
"\nDynamic section at offset %#" PRIx64 " contains %"
PRIu64 " ent
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29972
Roumen Petrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
--
You are re
10 matches
Mail list logo
