https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #28 from Alexander von Gluck IV ---
it looks like this one was done and can be closed? :-)
It'll be a little while until we (Haiku) update our binutils to be able to test
this.
For future lurkers,
https://git.haiku-os.org/haiku/t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #27 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d91c67e8730354c43fae86fa98fe593925882365
commit d91c67e8730354c43fae86fa98fe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #26 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b69c9d41e89498442cb5af5287f378b3583dd445
commit b69c9d41e89498442cb5af5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #25 from Tamar Christina ---
> > It's in the list you pasted, `elf32-bigarm pei-aarch64-little elf64-little`
> > the sorting is just a bit weird.
>
> Indeed, I guess I got a little blinded by all the chaff while I was looking
> fo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #24 from pjones at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #23)
> (In reply to pjo...@redhat.com from comment #22)
> > When we do that, we get these targets in "objdump --help":
> > aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #23 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to pjo...@redhat.com from comment #22)
> Created attachment 13739 [details]
> add aarch64_pei_vec to aarch64-*-linux* as well
>
> I had to add the attached patch as well to get the targets we
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #22 from pjones at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 13739
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13739&action=edit
add aarch64_pei_vec to aarch64-*-linux* as well
I had to add the attached patch as well to ge
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #21 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to pjo...@redhat.com from comment #19)
> Can you share your tree so we can replicate this locally?
I have pushed it to a branch called `users/ARM/efi-aarch64-support-binutils`
Would apprecia
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #20 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to pjo...@redhat.com from comment #19)
> Can you share your tree so we can replicate this locally? Aside from that,
> "objdump -f" or even "objdump -x" would be helpful.
>
Yes, I'll do some
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #19 from pjones at redhat dot com ---
Can you share your tree so we can replicate this locally? Aside from that,
"objdump -f" or even "objdump -x" would be helpful.
My initial suspicion is that it's not seeing your binary as relo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Steve McIntyre from comment #17)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #16)
> qemu-system-aarch64 -m 2048 --enable-kvm -vga none -nographic -machine
> virt,gic-version=host,kernel_irq
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #17 from Steve McIntyre ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #16)
> hmmm It looks like I'm dropped to a QEMU shell.
>
> (qemu) info status
> VM status: running
>
> which says running, perhaps I can't do this over SSH and
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina ---
hmmm It looks like I'm dropped to a QEMU shell.
(qemu) info status
VM status: running
which says running, perhaps I can't do this over SSH and a window has popped up
on the desktop? If so I'll check i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #15 from Steve McIntyre ---
Hmmm, OK.
That UEFI image (when padded up to 64MiB) starts here and will let me start an
OS or go into the shell OK. Are you getting any errors?(In reply to Tamar
Christina from comment #14)
> (In reply
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #14 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Steve McIntyre from comment #13)
> Hmmm, OK.
>
> That UEFI image (when padded up to 64MiB) starts here and will let me start
> an OS or go into the shell OK. Are you getting any errors?
N
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #13 from Steve McIntyre ---
Hmmm, OK.
That UEFI image (when padded up to 64MiB) starts here and will let me start an
OS or go into the shell OK. Are you getting any errors?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Steve McIntyre from comment #11)
> Hi!
>
> Do you have an existing UEFI image (e.g. edk2 AAVMF) to use for testing with?
I have been attempting to use QEMU_EFI.fd from
http://snapshots.l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #11 from Steve McIntyre ---
Hi!
Do you have an existing UEFI image (e.g. edk2 AAVMF) to use for testing with?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #10 from Tamar Christina ---
Does anyone happen to know of an easy(ish) way I can test this?
I've downloaded and modified https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnu-efi/ to
remove the hacks and fixed up the linker script.
I can now pro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
Robbie Harwood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rharwood at redhat dot com
--
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.38
Assignee|unassigned
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
Matt Johnston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at ucc dot asn.au
--
You are re
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pbrobinson at gmail dot com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #8 from pjones at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #7)
> (In reply to pjo...@redhat.com from comment #6)
> > FYI I've got a partial implementation here:
> > https://github.com/vathpela/binutils/tree/efi-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxim.kuvyrkov at gmail dot com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
pjones at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pjones at redhat dot com
-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
Steve McIntyre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steve-sourceware at einval dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #4 from Alexander von Gluck IV ---
(In reply to Ed Vielmetti from comment #3)
> This issue is mentioned in passing at
> https://sources.debian.org/src/shim-signed/1.36/debian/shim-signed.NEWS/
>
> shim-signed (1.34) unstable; urge
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
Ed Vielmetti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evielmetti at equinix dot com
--- Comm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #2 from Alexander von Gluck IV ---
A side note, #26218 is related to this one. while Pe aarch64 doesn't exist in
bfd, arm exists... but creates broken coff/non-pe binaries. Interesting that
pei-arm literally doesn't create pe bin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
33 matches
Mail list logo
