[Bug binutils/24456] bfd elf.c assertion for multiple relocations to same section

2019-09-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24456 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 11987 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11987&action=edit Test binary -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug binutils/24456] bfd elf.c assertion for multiple relocations to same section

2019-08-27 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24456 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/24456] bfd elf.c assertion for multiple relocations to same section

2019-08-23 Thread joe.lawrence at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24456 --- Comment #3 from Joe Lawrence --- Hi Nick, Thanks for revisiting this one! I can confirm that with the latest master branch, objdump can now process the .ko's that we've generated with multiple section relocations. Even if those follow-u

[Bug binutils/24456] bfd elf.c assertion for multiple relocations to same section

2019-08-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24456 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a7ba389645d178c43100ec47e513389ae8bf8f93 commit a7ba389645d178c43100ec47e51

[Bug binutils/24456] bfd elf.c assertion for multiple relocations to same section

2019-08-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24456 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug binutils/24456] bfd elf.c assertion for multiple relocations to same section

2019-04-17 Thread mbenes at suse dot cz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24456 Miroslav Benes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mbenes at suse dot cz -- You are re