https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Grant ---
It's a surprising that the patch clarifying bison, flex, texinfo packages are
required in the README was not considered useful. At the moment, every new
developer has 1 hour of time wasted before they can st
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
--- Comment #5 from Jon Grant ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #4)
> The purpose of "missing" as explained in the automake manual isn't to
> replace the missing tools, just to give a more informative error message
> abou
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The purpose of "missing" as explained in the automake manual isn't to
replace the missing tools, just to give a more informative error message
about them being missing.
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
--- Comment #3 from Jon Grant ---
Created attachment 11286
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11286&action=edit
clarify bison, flex, texinfo packages are required
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
--- Comment #2 from Jon Grant ---
Hi Nick!
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> Hi Jon,
>
> > 1)
> > Is there a way for ./configure to check for "makeinfo" "bison" "flex"
> > commands first? I just get it bailing out at the end half
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
