--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-31 22:04 ---
I am closing this bug. If we really want to handle .dynsym in DSOs created
by old linker, we can open a new bug report.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-12-08
06:23 ---
A similar problem can be seen on older dynamic objects. When stripping debug
sections, section syms for the removed sections are not removed from .dynsym,
because strip doesn't touch .dynsym. This leaves
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-07 18:53 ---
A patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-12/msg00058.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-12/msg00056.html
is similar. But it doesn't handle a section is removed by "-R".
--
http://sour
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-12-07 17:07 ---
The problem is that elf_discarded_section points to the input section, but
this is not the linker.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-12-07 16:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=782)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=782&action=view)
Test object
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991
--- You are receiving this mail becau
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-12-07 16:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=783)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=783&action=view)
Output of objcopy -g
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991
--- You are receiving this m
